Safety and Efficacy of Bariatric or Metabolic Surgery in Septuagenarians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Published on: 10 Sept 2025

Background:


With rising life expectancy, a growing number of older adults are living with obesity, posing significant healthcare challenges. Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most effective long-term treatment for obesity and related comorbidities, but its safety and efficacy in patients aged 70 and older (septuagenarians) remain debated due to concerns about increased surgical risks in this population.

Objective:

This study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze existing evidence to assess the safety (30-day morbidity and mortality, hospital stay) and efficacy (weight loss and comorbidity improvement) of MBS in septuagenarians compared to younger patients.

Methods:


A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases up to December 31, 2024, identifying studies involving patients aged ≥70 years undergoing primary MBS. Outcomes included 30-day morbidity and mortality, length of hospital stay, weight loss metrics (BMI, % total weight loss [%TWL], % excess weight loss [%EWL]), and improvements in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension (HTN). Study quality was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Data from 12 retrospective observational studies including 2528 septuagenarians and 194,666 younger patients were pooled using a random-effects model.

Results:

Discussion:


This meta-analysis provides comprehensive evidence that MBS is feasible and effective in selected septuagenarians, with important caveats. While older adults have higher short-term risks of morbidity and mortality, these risks are still relatively low in absolute terms and may be mitigated by careful patient selection and perioperative management. The lower complication rate with SG compared to RYGB suggests that surgical approach should be individualized in this population.

Frailty, rather than chronological age alone, is increasingly recognized as a critical predictor of surgical risk in older adults. Unfortunately, none of the included studies formally assessed frailty, limiting risk stratification. Incorporating frailty and comprehensive geriatric assessments into preoperative evaluation may improve outcomes by identifying patients most likely to benefit from surgery.
Despite somewhat attenuated weight loss, septuagenarians still experience substantial improvements in obesity-related comorbidities, supporting the clinical value of MBS for this group. The durability of these benefits and impact on functional status and quality of life remain areas for future research.

Limitations:


All included studies were retrospective observational designs with moderate risk of bias, limiting the strength of conclusions. High heterogeneity in long-term complications and weight loss outcomes likely reflects variability in surgical techniques, patient characteristics, and outcome definitions. Functional and quality-of-life outcomes were not reported. Prospective studies with standardized frailty assessment and longer follow-up are needed.

Conclusions:


Metabolic and bariatric surgery can be safely offered to well-selected septuagenarians, providing meaningful weight loss and metabolic benefits despite higher perioperative risks compared to younger patients. Age alone should not exclude patients from surgery; individualized assessment including frailty is essential. Future high-quality prospective research is needed to optimize patient selection and care pathways for this expanding demographic.

SOURCE/READ FULL ARTICLE: https://journals.lww.com/international-journal-of-surgery/abstract/9900/safety_and_efficacy_of_bariatric_or_metabolic.3235.aspx


LEARN MORE ABOUT THE MUSLIM WEIGHT MANAGEMENT

 

Share this post